RESEARCH RECORD
The slingstone study from ‘En Zippori and ‘En Esur
A bibliographic record of Haklay and colleagues’ 2023 study, with publication details and a link to the source.
A research card for an entry in this volume.
Volume index
An independent bibliographic index of the 17 entries listed in the volume’s official contents, with authors and source links.
Volume 111 · 2023 · 17 articles in this volume
Read at the sourceAn independent bibliographic volume record. Article titles, authors and publication details lead to the original works.
This volume examines warfare and defence across different periods. Its entries include slingstone assemblages, mace-heads, fortifications, gladiators, a legionary base and a sword from Newe-Yam. Read across these topics to compare research questions: how weapons are identified, how construction is dated, and what evidence supports a reconstruction of conflict.
This is a reading index, not an edition of the journal or a reproduction of its articles. The list follows the available official contents, including front matter where listed. Page details are supplied only where the source displays them. Follow the original entry to consult the study and its illustrations. Source 1.
Source
The research and references behind this page. Rights to external content remain with their owners.
· 2023 · Checked
Continue from here
Every card comes from a documented relation or an editorial link. The reason line explains the connection.
RESEARCH RECORD
A bibliographic record of Haklay and colleagues’ 2023 study, with publication details and a link to the source.
A research card for an entry in this volume.
RESEARCH RECORD
A record of the 2023 study The Old Sword and the Sea: authors, volume, pages and source links.
A research card for an entry in this volume.
RESEARCH RECORD
Haggai Olshanetsky reassesses archaeological and textual evidence for Jewish participation in the Roman arena.
A research card for an entry in this volume.
ANCIENT TECHNOLOGY · STONE
Assemblages from ‘En Ẓippori and ‘En Esur invite questions about organised work, proposed uses and the limits of evidence for conflict.
Related reading.
Adjust the reading experience to suit you. These tools complement your browser and device accessibility settings. Changes apply to this page; they are kept for another visit only if you allowed that in the privacy dialog.
Your choices apply to this page only. Moving to another page restores the defaults.